Students in 19 Districts Score Higher on CAP Test : Education: Glendora Unified eighth-graders show the most improvement. Scores in 10 districts decreased.
- Share via
Eighth-graders in the Glendora Unified School District led the state’s large school districts in improvement on the California Assessment Program writing tests, scoring 37 points higher than their fellow students the year before.
In all, scores in 19 San Gabriel Valley districts were up--12 scored double-digit gains--generally reflecting an increase in writing scores statewide. Ten districts showed decreases in the tests, which were taken last spring.
The 27,000-student Pomona Unified School District saw its scores rise by 20 points. As a result, Pomona averages inched above those in Pasadena Unified, another large urban district with 21,700 students. Test results were almost unchanged in Pasadena, dropping four points.
El Monte City, which has a highly transient population of 11,010, saw its scores plummet by 20 points. Only Bassett Unified and Los Angeles Unified, the nation’s second-largest school district after New York City, scored lower.
Among districts with 5,000 or more students, no other scores in the state rose by as much as Glendora’s. That district’s formula for success was amazingly straightforward, said Clint Taylor, assistant superintendent for educational services. Teachers in the 6,000-student district simply exposed students to the various types of writing on the tests.
“Our students needed to become more versatile,” Taylor said. “The most common assignment before was probably writing a story. And a student accomplished at writing a story may have a hard time writing a report of information or an essay.”
About 18 months ago, Taylor said, Glendora teachers began a training program, first for themselves and later for students, using CAP preparation materials available from the state.
“They took the manual from the CAP bureau, which described the different types of writing and obtained samples of the different types. They studied those samples carefully and practiced (helping) each other” compose essay topics.
Writing skills eligible for testing include autobiography, biography, problem-solution, persuasion and story-telling. Students don’t know what type of writing a given test will require, so versatility pays.
“We may not see gains like this next year, but I think we’ll still see gains,” Taylor said. “We’ve acquainted students with all . . . types of writing and to move them to the sophisticated mastery of these types will take more time and work.”
Room for improvement remains. Glendora scored better than 77% of districts across the state, but better than only 40% of similar districts--those with well-educated, generally prosperous families.
Generally affluent San Marino students, who had high writing scores last time, improved by 18 points to 353. San Marino 9Unified, with 2,700 students, scored better than 98% of districts, and 87% of demographically similar districts.
Though pleased, Assistant Supt. Jack Rose said he was not too impressed because CAP scores vary greatly from year to year.
Unlike many districts, San Marino has no particular CAP-preparation program. “We have never taught to the CAP test,” he said.
San Marino uses CAP scores to analyze potential weaknesses in particular skill areas, such as phonics. But Rose said the overall scores can be misleading to parents and school board members, whether they choose to moan or boast about their own district’s scores.
“Because of the socioeconomic background of our parents, our students do well,” he said. “That’s the major factor.”
Other districts serving generally prosperous areas also continued to do well. Arcadia Unified, with a score of 331, had the valley’s second highest average. Walnut Valley Unified came next with 302.
Social and economic hardships affecting students and their families are the main reasons for Pasadena’s static and still low scores, said William Bibbiani, the district’s director of research and testing. “There is no quick fix,” he said.
Nonetheless, he praised the idea behind CAP tests, particularly the just-released writing portion.
“Writing is essentially the skill that eventually puts it all together,” he said. “Clearly in urban and suburban districts, greater and greater emphasis needs to be put on writing, and it should begin at grades much earlier than it was traditionally introduced.”
A highly transient population is among the factors lowering test results in the El Monte City District by 20 points, said Supt. Jeff Seymour. Some district schools have turnover rates of more than 100% per school year, as families enter or leave the area in search of work, he said.
“CAP tests anyone who shows up at your door when the test is given,” he said. Nearly half the district’s students have a limited ability to speak English. Seymour said that students who remain in the district for several years perform above state averages on standardized tests.
Pomona’s 20-point improvement comes in the middle of a three-year plan to increase CAP scores. Like Glendora’s, the Pomona plan involves training teachers to prepare students, as much as possible, for what will appear on the CAP tests, said Assistant Supt. Cassandra George. Despite the gain, Pomona’s scores are still well below state averages.
“Our high expectations are going to lead to a better chance for these children to perform well in school and after they graduate,” she said. “We’re not going to accept less.”
HOW TO READ THE SCORES
Here are California Assessment Program writing scores earned by eighth graders in San Gabriel Valley area public school districts last spring.
The previous year’s scores also are provided for comparison purposes, although CAP officials warn against reading too much into one-year variations.
The scaled score is a combination of results on each of the various types of writing tasks assigned. The average score in the state was 259, up four points over last year’s score; the average for students in Los Angeles County was 236,
representing a six-point rise.
Relative rank is a way to compare a district or a school with another that is similar in terms of student socioeconomic makeup and students’ ability to speak, read and write English fluently as well as how often those students move from school to school. The value listed is the school’s percentile rank within its comparison group.
State rank shows the school or district’s ranking (on a score of 1 to 99), comparing its scores to those of every other school or district in California.
Alhambra City Elementary DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 279 91 70 88-89 270 87 65
BALDWIN
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 277 88 65 88-89 266 79 61
BRIGHTWOOD
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 326 80 92 88-89 345 97 96
EMERY PARK
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 232 36 30 88-89 258 57 54
FREMONT
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 267 73 57 88-89 279 87 70
GARFIELD
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 263 82 53 88-89 231 64 29
GRANADA
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 293 93 76 88-89 237 46 35
MARGUERITA
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 297 95 78 88-89 295 94 82
MONTEREY HIGHLANDS
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 268 80 58 88-89 272 84 65
NORTHRUP
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 247 86 41 88-89 249 88 45
PARK
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 287 94 73 88-89 257 85 52
RAMONA
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 249 88 42 88-89 276 93 68
REPETTO
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 338 99 95 88-89 318 98 91
YNEZ
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 291 99 75 88-89 227 67 27
Arcadia Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 331 86 95 88-89 318 74 92
DANA
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 314 60 88 88-89 336 80 95
FIRST AVENUE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 315 92 88 88-89 304 81 86
FOOTHILLS
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 360 91 97 88-89 318 60 91
Azusa Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 219 36 19 88-89 193 13 2
CENTER
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 228 41 27 88-89 215 23 20
FOOTHILL
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 223 24 22 88-89 189 4 9
SLAUSON
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 205 43 12 88-89 173 13 5
Baldwin Park Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 221 46 21 88-89 228 52 26
CHARLES D. JONES
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 212 36 15 88-89 215 36 20
HOLLAND
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 209 42 14 88-89 230 53 29
OLIVE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 231 62 29 88-89 228 54 27
SIERRA VISTA
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 234 47 31 88-89 242 64 40
Bassett Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 210 34 16 88-89 213 47 19
EDGEWOOD
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 227 51 26 88-89 209 39 16
TORCH
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 196 19 10 88-89 216 54 20
Bonita Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 273 36 63 88-89 278 55 72
LONE HILL
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 251 11 44 88-89 254 14 49
RAMONA
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 290 51 74 88-89 295 74 82
Charter Oak Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 269 26 59 88-89 243 9 40
ROYAL OAK
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 269 26 59 88-89 243 9 41
Claremont Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 296 36 80 88-89 283 21 76
EL ROBLE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 296 36 78 88-89 283 21 73
Covina-Valley Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 255 39 45 88-89 258 37 52
LAS PALMAS
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 226 19 25 88-89 233 19 32
SIERRA VISTA
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 287 54 73 88-89 284 47 74
TRAWEEK
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 249 39 42 88-89 257 43 52
Duarte Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 243 65 38 88-89 228 32 26
NORTHVIEW
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 243 65 37 88-89 228 32 27
El Monte City DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 214 41 17 88-89 234 66 33
COLUMBIA
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 203 41 12 88-89 225 64 26
DURFEE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 221 34 20 88-89 252 66 47
GIDLEY
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 203 20 12 88-89 219 39 21
POTRERO
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 195 28 9 88-89 207 45 16
RIO HONDO
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 252 60 45 88-89 292 94 80
WRIGHT
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 224 62 23 88-89 233 74 32
Garvey Elementary DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 241 82 36 88-89 254 90 50
GARVEY
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 247 86 41 88-89 262 93 57
FERN
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 230 70 29 88-89 237 79 35
Glendora Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 289 40 77 88-89 252 7 49
GODDARD
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 313 55 87 88-89 267 11 61
SANDBURG
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 266 24 56 88-89 239 4 37
Hacienda La Puente Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 261 55 52 88-89 249 40 45
CEDARLANE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 277 64 65 88-89 261 51 56
GRANDVIEW
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 252 64 45 88-89 226 28 26
MESA ROBLES
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 309 51 86 88-89 297 37 83
NEWTON
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 301 77 81 88-89 286 49 75
ORANGE GROVE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 267 31 57 88-89 271 36 64
SIERRA VISTA
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 226 34 25 88-89 243 60 41
SPARKS
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 229 51 28 88-89 209 24 16
Los Angeles Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 208 30 15 88-89 202 21 16
EL SERENO JR. HIGH
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 195 28 9 88-89 178 13 7
GRIFFITH JR. HIGH
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 207 45 13 88-89 202 30 14
Monrovia Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 276 83 66 88-89 279 89 73
CLIFTON
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 262 68 52 88-89 276 86 68
SANTA FE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 296 94 78 88-89 282 92 72
Montebello Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 230 64 26 88-89 224 57 24
BELL GARDENS
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 225 64 24 88-89 207 45 16
EASTMONT
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 177 11 4 88-89 220 59 22
LA MERCED
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 229 54 28 88-89 235 53 33
MACY
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 268 66 58 88-89 272 79 65
MONTEBELLO
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 250 88 43 88-89 217 56 21
SUVA
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 230 70 29 88-89 211 49 17
Mountain View Elementary DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 223 62 22 88-89 238 80 38
BAKER
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 232 72 30 88-89 268 95 62
KRANZ
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 219 58 19 88-89 228 68 27
Pasadena Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 220 15 19 88-89 224 17 24
ELIOT
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 207 8 13 88-89 240 30 38
MARSHALL FUND.
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 265 17 55 88-89 242 9 40
WASHINGTON
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 204 20 12 88-89 216 19 20
WILSON
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 217 15 18 88-89 211 9 17
Pomona Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 225 43 23 88-89 205 20 17
EMERSON
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 223 30 22 88-89 214 12 19
FREMONT
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 183 21 6 88-89 156 6 2
LORBEER
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 303 56 83 88-89 269 15 63
MARSHALL
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 219 58 19 88-89 198 30 12
PALOMARES
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 222 51 21 88-89 177 5 6
SIMONS
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 201 38 11 88-89 207 45 16
Rosemead Elementary DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 229 45 25 88-89 232 57 31
MUSCATEL
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 229 45 28 88-89 232 57 31
Rowland Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 278 82 68 88-89 271 59 66
ALVARADO
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 302 90 82 88-89 286 57 75
GIANO
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 272 88 62 88-89 255 71 50
RINCON
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 257 53 49 88-89 270 44 64
San Gabriel Elementary DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 247 56 40 88-89 240 30 38
JEFFERSON
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 247 56 41 88-89 240 30 38
San Marino Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 353 87 98 88-89 335 74 95
HUNTINGTON
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 353 87 97 88-89 335 74 94
South Pasadena Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 287 28 76 88-89 279 19 73
SOUTH PASADENA
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 287 28 73 88-89 279 19 70
Temple City Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 279 31 70 88-89 263 23 58
OAK AVENUE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 279 31 67 88-89 263 23 59
Valle Lindo Elementary DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 226 54 23 88-89 210 20 18
SHIVELY
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 226 54 25 88-89 210 20 17
Walnut Valley Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 306 58 89 88-89 304 64 87
CHAPARRAL
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 338 78 95 88-89 317 59 90
SUZANNE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 271 23 61 88-89 286 69 75
West Covina Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 257 51 47 88-89 236 28 34
EDGEWOOD
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 89-90 257 51 49 88-89 236 28 34
More to Read
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.